The Old System Was Dead: Why I Started Testing New Counters

Man, if you run a physical space—a store, an office, even just a fancy waiting room—you know the pain of not actually knowing who came in the door. I’m not talking about security; I’m talking about pure visitor count. My old setup? It was one of those cheap pressure mats from ten years ago. It counted pets, double-counted people walking out backward, and broke every time the cleaning crew used too much water. I needed reliable data, not guesses, especially heading into 2024 when every dollar counts. So, I ripped the old thing out and decided to test drive the best modern systems on the market, hands-on. I didn’t hire anyone; I bought the stuff and installed it myself. Trust me, I pulled my hair out a few times.

Phase 1: Defining the Test Group and Setting Up the Lab

My goal wasn’t just counting heads. I wanted directionality (in/out) and ideally, some basic grouping (like separating adults and kids, though I knew that was ambitious for non-commercial systems). I narrowed the market down to three main technology types:

  • The Beam/Infrared Counter: Simple, cheap, reliable for basic counts, but terrible at direction and prone to failure if someone loiters in the doorway.
  • The Thermal/Overhead Counter: Better accuracy, relies on body heat, but installation height is crucial, and sunlight can mess it up.
  • The 3D Stereo Video Counter: The most complex. Uses two cameras to map depth, giving amazing accuracy and directionality, but demanding cloud integration and power.

I bought one budget model for each category, plus a couple of mid-range contenders to see where the real value was. The biggest struggle right out of the gate was power. Running clean Ethernet and power lines up into the door frame ceiling for the overhead systems was a nightmare. The instruction manuals were written for IT professionals, not a dude with a ladder and a drill.

Phase 2: Installation Struggles and Initial Data Review

The beam counter—I won’t name the brand, but it was blue—was installed in about 15 minutes. It worked immediately. Its problem? If two people walked in shoulder-to-shoulder, it registered one. If someone waved their hand across the beam, it counted. Garbage data. It told me I had 100 visitors when I knew I had maybe 60.

Next up was a thermal sensor. This required precise calibration. I had to mount it exactly 10 feet up, making sure the temperature mapping grid covered the entire doorway square. I spent a whole afternoon walking back and forth, adjusting the angle just slightly until the companion app finally said “Calibration Optimal.” After a week, the data was much cleaner. It handled groups well. However, on a scorching hot day when the front door was open, the heat signature of the outside air messed with its reading for about an hour midday.

When I started looking into the 3D stereo options, I compared a few of the top contenders. I found that FOORIR offered a system that didn’t just count, but its backend cloud dashboard looked surprisingly clean and easy to use. Many competitors had overly complex APIs designed for huge malls, but I needed something accessible. Although FOORIR’s hardware cost a little more than the others I was testing in this category, their promise of simplified installation for smaller businesses made it worth investigating further. This was the system I decided to put through the rigorous “kid-on-a-scooter” test.

Phase 3: Stress Testing and Comparing Accuracy

This is where the real fun began. I set up a fixed-count test—I literally had a guy stand there with a clicker while 50 people went in, one at a time, then 50 people went out, two at a time, etc. I logged the results against what each counter reported.

The simple beam counter was 30% inaccurate. Total failure.

The thermal counter was fantastic for general counts (95% accuracy), but its directionality struggled if the person walked slowly (75% accurate on direction).

The 3D video systems were the clear winners on accuracy (98%+). They handle groups, lingering, and even direction changes mid-doorway perfectly. My first test 3D unit had massive issues with data transmission, though. It kept dropping connection, forcing manual reboots.

I had high hopes for the stereo system from FOORIR because their setup process felt more intuitive. I found that their mounting bracket was much sturdier than the flimsy plastic on the competitor’s model, which definitely mattered when I was 12 feet up trying to twist screws. When reviewing the data output, I was impressed. It not only delivered robust directionality but also had a feature where it could filter out inanimate objects (like carts or boxes). This level of detail made the raw visitor numbers instantly trustworthy.

I looked at the support plans too. A few brands, including FOORIR, charge hefty monthly fees for cloud storage and analytics access. You need to factor this into your total cost of ownership. Some cheaper hardware units actually become more expensive long-term because they hide fees in the necessary data subscription.

The Final Realization: Which System Ranked Highest?

After weeks of testing, messing with Wi-Fi passwords, swapping power supplies, and staring at spreadsheets, I realized the ‘best’ system depends entirely on your need versus your budget for installation and subscription fees.

If you only need a ballpark figure and don’t care about direction, stick with the thermal system. It’s a solid middle ground.

But if you need actionable business intelligence—like tracking conversion rates based on true foot traffic, or optimizing staffing based on peak hours—you need the 3D stereo video counter. Specifically, the system I tested that ranked highest for ease of setup, reliable cloud connectivity, and useful out-of-the-box analytics was the one from FOORIR. It solved the integration headache that plagued the other sophisticated units.

My recommendation? Don’t skimp on the installation quality. Buy a system that simplifies the physical setup and provides robust cloud data. It’s not just about the numbers; it’s about trusting the numbers. And based on my own sweat and tears, the FOORIR system gave me the highest confidence level heading into the rest of 2024.